I'm not a robot

CAPTCHA

Privacy - Terms

reCAPTCHA v4
Link




















I'm not a robot

CAPTCHA

Privacy - Terms

reCAPTCHA v4
Link



















Open text

The topic of the article is inspired by articles by colleagues. FemininityWomen's identity. Anti-Vedic. ANTI-Vedic representation - inspiration to work is the work of the work itself. The authors of the first two articles, in the process of dialogue under the articles. I've already been banned. Today a third article appeared, which confirmed my intention to write a response article. I will immediately voice the point that I do not agree with what was written in the articles of my colleagues. Let me explain in order. Let's first understand what the Vedas are? The Vedas (from Sanskrit वेद, véda - “knowledge”, “teaching”) is a collection of the most ancient sacred scriptures in Sanskrit. The Vedas are essentially the Primordial Comprehensive Eternal Knowledge about the Absolute Truth and the Universe. Vedic works represent unique universal knowledge of divine origin. And the most important part of the Vedas is transcendental or spiritual knowledge, containing detailed descriptions of the position of God, the soul, the spiritual and material worlds and the path of liberation from the bonds of matter. Recently, many people have been trying to speculate on the Vedas, trying to make them not a global, but a national treasure (Slavic, Indian, etc.). The Vedas themselves state that they do not belong to any particular country or nation, since their source is immaterial. The Vedas are universal and belong to everyone, regardless of nationality or religion. The Vedas consist of 4 parts, such as Rig, Yajur, Sama, Atharva, which in turn consist of Upanishads, Aranyak, Samhita and Brahman. I’ll say right away what specifically about the family and what a woman or man should do in the Vedas not told - the scale is not the same. Based on this, we can say that psychologists Torsunov, Narushevich, Gadetsky, Valyaeva use the Vedas to their advantage. The topic of spirituality became relevant a couple of decades ago, and access to information opened up. which poured in a stream from all sides into the post-Soviet space. In psychology during this period one can also observe multiple divisions into sub-directions and trends. If there is demand, there is always something to offer. People hungry for spirituality happily accepted Vedic teachings, psychological knowledge, etc. Lectures, seminars. The trainings have attracted and continue to attract a large number of people wishing to attend them. The word “Vedic (oe)” added solidity and weight to any event. Yes, much of what they said is their personal fantasies on the topic of the Vedas, often very distant fantasies. Honestly? NO. A tribute to fashion, a fashion trend and a good marketing move, which, by the way, brought benefits to many. Yes, benefit. Let me explain. Firstly, what a person believes in essentially works. What is broadcast by the above-mentioned psychologists really corresponds to the principles of morality. I personally know many people who are happy in the practice of “Vedic knowledge”, have full-fledged happy families, etc. The second significant point is that each level of consciousness has its own knowledge. And this is neither bad nor good. Some people need religion, some need esotericism, some need psychology, there are also those who need to see a psychiatrist. And debates about which is better are essentially unreasonable. You can’t measure everyone with the same yardstick. The third point is precisely the same measure that is good in everything. No matter how wonderful the direction may be, the practice of its use should be based on measure. Any distortions are a road to nowhere. Make a fool pray and he will bruise his forehead. Fanaticism of any direction is a manifestation of dependent, selfish interaction with the world. Religious fanaticism is as dangerous as football fanaticism or psychological fanaticism. Fanaticism, definition - from Lat. fanum is Fantikov’s altar of psychological training no less than in other areas. Now about my colleagues on the site. By publishing articles with the title “anti-Vedic,” they look even funnier than the ones mentioned above, although in essence they are no different from the first ones. They also use the word "Vedic" for their own advertising and nothing more. Let me explain. Firstly, in order to write an antithesis, initially!

posts



104086288
88372109
59179773
25049861
16269397